![]() ![]() Because the study looked at only England-an island country in which everyone lives within 72 miles of the coast, it’s not clear whether the findings would apply to other populations. But the study did find that the association between coastal living and better health was strongest for those living in the poorest areas, which perhaps indicates that wealth cannot explain the results, Wheeler saiD. For instance, it could be that people who are wealthier, and therefore healthier, are more able to move to desired locations such as the coast, Wheeler said, a phenomenon known as the migrant effect. The study only found an association, not a cause-effect link, and it’s possible that other factors could explain the results. ![]() However, it’s too soon to advise people to hit the beach to improve health, Wheeler saiD. But a small effect, when applied to an entire population can have a substantial impact on public health, said study researcher Ben Wheeler of Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry in Exeter, EnglanD. The difference from living near the coast was relatively small. They pointed to another British study that found that people who took trips to the coast experienced more feelings of calmness and relaxation than those who visited urban parks or the countrysidE. Living near the coast may be associated with better health because the seaside environment reduces stress, the researchers saiD. Living near the beach may come with an extra advantage: better health.A.new study analyzed information from more than 48 million people in England and found that the nearer they lived to the coast, the more likely people were to report good health within the past year. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |